Legal Opinion
State v. Manning
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided July 1, 1992No. 10-91-221-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VANCE, Justice.
Steve Manning was charged with the offense of hindering a secured creditor. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 32.33 (Vernon 1989). After a jury was empaneled and sworn, he pled not guilty. During the testimony of the first witness, Manning objected to two exhibits — a security agreement and a loan agreement. After the court sustained his objection, the State moved to dismiss the indictment. The State contends in two points that the court erred in sustaining the objection to the exhibits. Manning has, however, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, asserting that the State cannot…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State v. YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Capistran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- McElwee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dean v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- State v. Rhodes, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- State v. AbregoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- City of Milford v. Nestor Calderon, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.