Legal Opinion

State v. Bogle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 22, 2005No. 93C20795; A116076Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for numerous crimes, raising six assignments of error concerning the validity of his convictions and three assignments of error concerning the validity of his sentences. We reject without discussion defendant’s assignments of error challenging his convictions. In one of his assignments of error concerning sentencing, defendant argues that the imposition of a departure sentence based on a finding that he was on suspension'at the time of the offense of kidnapping in the first degree violated the rule of law announced in Blakely v. Washington, 542…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. MuyingoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API