Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Roxborough

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1995No. 90-SP-228Published

1DissentTerry, Associate Judge

My colleagues conclude that appellant, by omitting the trial court’s order of contempt from the record on appeal, has failed to present us with “a record sufficient to show affirmatively that error occurred.” Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., 453 A.2d 110, 111 (D.C.1982) (citations omitted). I agree that appellant’s case might well be stronger if the contempt order were before us. What the record does contain, however, is a transcript of the show cause hearing. That transcript convinces me that appellant lacked the requisite state of mind to be convicted of contempt, and for that reason I would…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Grant Sykes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. Matter of GorfkleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Matter of HuntDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API