Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commercial Standard Insurance v. Remay

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1937No. 6435Published

1Dissent

BUDGE, J.,

Dissenting. — In my opinion the judgment in this case should not be reversed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion. The ground of reversal is based upon the failure of respondent to affirmatively allege in his answer waiver or estoppel. Generally speaking when waiver or estoppel are relied upon as a defense they should be specially pleaded. There are however exceptions to this general rule. In the case at bar the appellant in seeking to establish forfeiture under the terms of the conditional sales contract introduced evidence showing that the specific terms or provisions of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Loftis v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hartley v. BohrerIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Joyce Bros. v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Applebaum v. StantonIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Pease v. Teller Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API