Legal Opinion

Treasure Coast Motor Sales, Inc. v. Heaton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 11, 2003No. 4D02-4662PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

We reverse an order denying Treasure Coast’s motion to compel arbitration. The arbitration is required by the terms of the parties’ motor vehicle purchase agreement.

Heaton paid Treasure Coast for a Land Cruiser in accordance with the terms of the contract, but Treasure Coast refused to deliver the vehicle. Heaton sued for specific performance and deceptive and unfair trade practices and Treasure Coast moved to compel arbitration.

The contract contained the following arbitration clause:

ANY CONTROVERSY OR CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT OR THE BREACH THEREOF, SHALL BE SETTLED…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ocwen Federal Bank FSB v. LVWD, LTD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anthony James Dev., Inc. v. Balboa Street Beach Club, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API