Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 2009No. 248 C.D. 2009, 250 C.D. 2009Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

The issue in this appeal is whether the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is an “arm of the state” enjoying Eleventh Amendment immunity from liability under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA).1 Coming to a different conclusion than does the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the majority finds that SEPTA is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. It does so because, like all authorities in Pennsylvania, even those created mainly by local governments for purely local purposes, it is denominated as an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API