Legal Opinion

State v. Hayen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2008No. 24549PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] .The State of South Dakota appeals from a circuit court order suppressing evidence obtained from a traffic stop on a main thoroughfare in Sioux Falls, Minnehaha County, South Dakota. A Sioux Falls police officer, Officer Flogstad, stopped Wade Hayen because he was unable to see the expiration date on the bottom of the temporary thirty-day dealer’s license. The temporary license was properly positioned and displayed on the rear driver’s side window of Hayen’s new pickup truck; however, a box in the back of the pickup obstructed the bottom of the license preventing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Gregory Lynn Cummins, United States of America v. Timothy Akins, A/K/A Michael MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Patrick Nolan McSwainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Jayel Antrone ColemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. State v. AppleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. BergeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Sound SleeperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API