Harewood v. Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc. (In Re Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:
The issue before us is whether an indigent party who brings an adversary complaint in a pending bankruptcy proceeding, under either the Bankruptcy Act (“the Act”) or the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”), may proceed without the payment of filing fees, that is, in forma pauperis. For the reasons given below, we conclude that such a party, who satisfies the normal requirements for in forma pauperis status, may so proceed under both the Act and the Code.
This issue was raised by the recent filings of an adversary proceeding under the Act and of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Jon Robert Perroton, Debtor. Jon Robert Perroton v. Nancy L.G. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Nieves v. Melendez (In Re Melendez)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- McGinnis v. McGinnis (In Re McGinnis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
- Anderson v. Poole (In Re Poole)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Benoit v. Lassina (In Re Lassina)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.