Legal Opinion

Harewood v. Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc. (In Re Sarah Allen Home for the Aged, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1980No. 19-10497PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issue before us is whether an indigent party who brings an adversary complaint in a pending bankruptcy proceeding, under either the Bankruptcy Act (“the Act”) or the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”), may proceed without the payment of filing fees, that is, in forma pauperis. For the reasons given below, we conclude that such a party, who satisfies the normal requirements for in forma pauperis status, may so proceed under both the Act and the Code.

This issue was raised by the recent filings of an adversary proceeding under the Act and of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Jon Robert Perroton, Debtor. Jon Robert Perroton v. Nancy L.G. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Nieves v. Melendez (In Re Melendez)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
  3. McGinnis v. McGinnis (In Re McGinnis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Anderson v. Poole (In Re Poole)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Benoit v. Lassina (In Re Lassina)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API