Legal Opinion

Fassy v. Kenyon

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 23, 1984No. 01-84-0042-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Justice.

Relators seek a writ of mandamus from this court to compel respondent, the Honorable Thomas Kenyon, Judge of the 300th District Court of Brazoria County, to set aside his order enjoining the enforcement of a judgment of the 309th Family District Court of Harris County.

This court granted leave to file based upon the expanded jurisdiction of the Courts of Appeals with respect to the issuance of writs of mandamus. Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 1824 (Vernon Supp. 1983). Mandamus is an appropriate remedy to settle a jurisdictional conflict between courts. See Curtis v. Gibbs, 511…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jackson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Seay v. ValderasTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Brox v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Whitfield v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Solomon, Lambert, Roth & Associates, Inc. v. Kidd, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Orion Enterprises, Inc. v. Pope, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. In Re John G. Kenedy Memorial Foundation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. In the Interest of M.R.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. In Re John G. Kenedy Memorial Foundation, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API