Legal Opinion

Kyricopoulos v. Attorney Gen.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 24, 2019No. SJC-12608PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kyricopoulos has now filed what appears to have been intended as a memorandum and appendix pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001). Technically speaking, rule 2:21 does not apply in this situation because Kyricopoulos is not challenging any interlocutory ruling of the trial court. It is nonetheless clear that he is not entitled to review pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. He continues to raise issues related to the delay in the assembly of the record in the trial court. To the extent that the record was assembled and Kyricopoulos's direct appeal was properly entered in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gorod v. TabachnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Peter Kyricopoulos v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API