Swartz v. Kingsbury County

PE!R CURIAM.

The situation here presented is similar in many respects to that in the case of Clark v. Board of County Commissioners, 64 S. D. 417, 267 N. W. 138, wherein opinion was this day filed, to which reference is made for applicable law. The only features distinguishing the two cases upon the facts are that the plaintiff in the instant case was a sheriff instead of a state’s attorney and his claim for additional mileage allowance, so far as it concerned the fiscal year 1934, was filed prior to the last day of March next succeeding after the close oí the fiscal year (section 15, c. 79,…