MATTER OF SIAO-PAO v. Dennison
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
The courts below applied the correct legal standards and properly considered the Board of Parole’s written determination, which, when evaluated in the context of the parole hearing transcript, demonstrated that the Board considered the required statutory factors (see Executive Law § 259-i; Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000]). The Board’s written determination, while less detailed than it might be, is not merely “conclusory” and so does not violate Executive Law § 259-i (2) (a)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MATTER OF SILMON v. TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by31 opinions
- Montane v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Miller v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Delacruz v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Galbreith v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Patterson v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.