Legal Opinion

MATTER OF SIAO-PAO v. Dennison

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2008PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The courts below applied the correct legal standards and properly considered the Board of Parole’s written determination, which, when evaluated in the context of the parole hearing transcript, demonstrated that the Board considered the required statutory factors (see Executive Law § 259-i; Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000]). The Board’s written determination, while less detailed than it might be, is not merely “conclusory” and so does not violate Executive Law § 259-i (2) (a)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MATTER OF SILMON v. TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Montane v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Miller v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Delacruz v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Galbreith v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Patterson v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API