Legal Opinion

Dreier v. Holt

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal eeom Ciecuit Judge, Eiest Cieouit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

This was a hill to foreclose a mortgage by the defendant Iiolt and his wife dated August 5, 1899, which purports to include 2-27 of certain lands at Waianae and Waialua in the County of Oahu. The controversy is in respect of these lands only, there being no question about the other lands covered by the mortgage. The Waialua Agricultural Company, Limited, in its answer and cross bill, claimed the same interest under a mortgage by Holt of Hay 16, 1898, foreclosure of which was sought by the cross bill. The answer of the defendant Colburn avers his ownership of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. SchermerhornNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  2. Gates v. HesterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Dennis v. TarpennyNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Hawaiian Trust & Investment Co. v. BartonHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lalakea v. Hilo Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Long v. HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bishop Trust Co. v. ThomasHawaii Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API