Legal Opinion

Previdi v. Hirsch

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Nicholas Colabella, J.

In a CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks, inter alia, to invalidate certain actions taken by respondents as arbitrary and capricious and in violation of the Open Meetings Law (Public Officers Law § 100 et seq.).

THE JUNE 18, 1987 EXECUTIVE SESSION

Initially in issue is the adequacy of notice of an executive session held June 18, 1987. Respondents maintain they provided such notice as was required by Public Officers Law § 104 (2). That subdivision applies to meetings that are scheduled less than one week beforehand, as follows: "Public notice of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. New York University v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Daily Gazette Co. v. Town BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  4. MATTER OF SANNA v. Lindenhurst Bd. of Educ.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Concerned Citizens to Review the Jefferson Valley Mall v. Town Board of YorktownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thorne v. Village of Millbrook Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Wm. J. Kline & Sons, Inc. v. County of HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API