Legal Opinion

In re Winn-Ritzenberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 21, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appeal from order, dated February 27, 2009, deemed an application by petitioner for review pursuant to CPLR 5704 (b) (see Matter of Washington, 216 AD2d 781 [1995]), and so considered, order reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to Civil Court for entry of an order granting the petition consistent herewith.

We exercise our discretion under CPLR 5704 (b) and grant the transgendered petitioner’s application for a name change corresponding with petitioner’s male gender identity. The record shows that petitioner satisfied the requirements for a name change under…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re HalliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. In re WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re GuidoCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  4. In re AnonymousCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re E.P.L.New York Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. In re PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API