Legal Opinion

Lobdell v. Leichtenberger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1995No. 1516, 1517PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

This consolidated appeal is from two orders of the trial court following the dismissal of a petition to appoint a board of viewers to open a private road. 1 Respondents filed preliminary objections, including a demurrer. After argument, the court granted the demurrer stating that petitioners failed to state a cause of action for which relief could be granted. This appeal followed. We reverse.

The underlying facts of this matter taken from the pleadings involve a tract of land which at one time was under common ownership. It was split in the late 1800’s causing the tract involved…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Little AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Pocopson RoadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  4. In Re Laying Out & Opening a Private RoadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. In re Road in Plumcreek TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clayton v. McCulloughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Bartlinski v. Northumberland Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. In Re Laying Out & Opening a Private Road in Sullivan TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. MAZZANTE v. McClintockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Reber v. TschudyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API