Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Kepley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1903No. 12,760PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

Max Ernst and Schwartz, Jerkowski & Oo. brought actions in attachment against one A. L. House, and levied on merchandise which House had theretofore mortgaged to Schloss Bros. & Co. Before seizing the goods, Kepley, the sheriff who held the writs, demanded indemnifying bonds from the plaintiffs in the attachments. They were given by plaintiff in error, and are the bonds sued on in this action. Thereafter, Schloss Bros. & Oo., mortgagees of the merchandise, brought an action for damages against Kepley and his bondsmen to recover the value of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. CorbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Guaranty Savings Bank v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elwert v. MarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Basic Refractories, Inc. v. BrightNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Burnett v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API