Sargent's Heirs v. Knox
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Western Dist. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OS THE PISTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE OS THE. SEVENTH PRESIDING. This is an action for work done by the job, and at different times, by the ancestor of the plaintiffs, who was a brick mason and brick maker for the defendant. The services are alleged to have been rendered between the 1st of February, 1830, and the 30th of November following.
Read the full summary
Western Dist. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OS THE PISTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE OS THE. SEVENTH PRESIDING. This is an action for work done by the job, and at different times, by the ancestor of the plaintiffs, who was a brick mason and brick maker for the defendant. The services are alleged to have been rendered between the 1st of February, 1830, and the 30th of November following. The sum claimed is four hundred and forty-three dollars and fifty-five cents, according to a detailed account annexed. The defendant pleaded a general denial; that if the plaintiffs ever had any claim against him, it…
1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.
This case cannot be distinguished from the one against the same defendant just decided. The same plea is relied on under- similar circumstances, and the question must receive the same solution.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed, with costs.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Universal Motor Co. v. RollandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932