Legal Opinion
Murphy's Appeal from Probate
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 31, 1990No. 8406PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the summary judgment rendered for the defendants in each of two companion cases involving an appeal from the Probate Court. The first appeal from the Probate Court involves the denial of his petition to remove a coexecutor. The second appeal is from the Probate Court’s removal of the plaintiff as coexecutor of the estate of Katherine B. Murphy.
The plaintiff is one of six children of the late Katherine B. Murphy, all of whom are beneficiaries of her estate. He was named as one of four coexecutors under her will. At the time of her death, the decedent owned two pieces…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sadlowski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conti v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Schiavone v. SnyderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Stanley's Appeal from ProbateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Murphy's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Unc, Inc. v. Southeastern Conn. Reg. Res., No. 102544 (Sep. 2, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.