Legal Opinion

Kelce v. Touche Ross & Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 13, 1976No. C-940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle

We are reviewing here the dismissal of an action instituted in a Colorado district court by a resident plaintiff. The trial court dismissed on the basis of forum non conveniens concluding, after a balancing of factors including the location of the evidence, the expense of securing witnesses and the availability of other courts, that Colorado was not an appropriate forum. The court of appeals, 37 Colo. App. 352, 549 P.2d 415 (1976), affirmed this decision. We reverse.

This is one of a large number of suits instituted in various parts of the country which stem from alleged improprieties in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. LohnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Kelce v. Touche Ross & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Reagan v. DickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Sabino v. RuffoloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. State, Department of Highways v. District Court ex rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. UIH-SFCC Holdings, L.P. v. BrigatoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Cox v. Sage Hospitality Resources, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API