Legal Opinion

Piledrivers' Local Union No. 2375 v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1982No. 82-5605PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, Senior District Judge:

Piledrivers’ Local Union No. 2375 (Union), appellant, filed an action to compel the Attorney General (A.G.) and the Immigration and Naturalization. Service (INS), appellees, to enforce the Immigration and Nationality Act1 (I.N.A.) on the outer continental shelf. The district court, 541 F.Supp. 460, granted summary judgment against the Union, and the Union appealed.

In 1981, Texaco, Inc. hired Heerema Marine Contractors to install a drilling and production platform on the outer continental shelf of the United States. Heerema, a Swiss corporation, installs offshore…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Arthur Edward Sheehan v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, an Instrumentality of the Departments of the Army and of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brown v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. Borntrager v. StevasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association v. United States of America, Pit River Tribal Council, Cross-Claimant-Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellees v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, United States of America, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Counterclaim v. Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association Erin Forrest, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants v. Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association, Cross-Claim-Defendants-Appellants. Pit River Tribal Council, Cross-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association Erin Forrest, Cross-Claim-Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Piledrivers' Local Union No. 2375 v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. International Longshoremen's And Warehousemen's Union v. Edwin M. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API