Legal Opinion
Hartford Insurance v. Blackburn
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 13, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 88-3004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Hartford Insurance Company, seeks a declaration that its insured, Zachary Blackburn, was not involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist and that it has no duty to arbitrate Blackburn’s claim for uninsured motorist’s benefits. On June 14, 1988, I issued an order denying Blackburn’s motion to dismiss. Hartford subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. There being no material facts in dispute, the question of whether Blackburn was involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist is one of law. See Myers v. State Farm Ins.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Myers, Kevin v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Binczewski v. Centennial InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- White v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997