Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Clayton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1983No. 15380-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVIN, Judge.

In this appeal, the wife contends that the award of $300 per month alimony pendente lite in the judgment is insufficient for her needs. We amend to increase the award and affirm the amended judgment.

The wife’s list of her estimated monthly expenses totalled $1,715.00, but she testified that she could “get by” on $1,000 per month. She managed her own gift shop during the marriage but ceased business operations when she left the matrimonial domicile because of alleged threats against her life. She is presently residing in another state with her eldest son and is not employed.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Arrendell v. ArrendellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Whipple v. WhippleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Ryan v. RyanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Galbraith v. GalbraithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clayton v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Cook v. CookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API