Legal Opinion

In re Carpenter

New York County Courts

Decided March 15, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to vacate the award of commissioners appointed to determine the necessity of a proposed alteration of a highway in the town of Marlborough, and to ascertain and .assess the ■damages resulting therefrom.

1Opinion of the CourtClearwater, J.

At the October, 1894, term, upon due notice to all persons interested, an order was made appointing three commissioners to determine whether a proposed alteration of one of the leading highways in the town of Marlborough was necessary, and, if found so to be, then to ascertain and .assess the damages resulting therefrom. It is admitted that *691the notices required by the statute were duly posted in three public places in the town, and were served upon all the persons designated by the statute. These notices, among other things, recited the appointment of the commissioners, the purpose for which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re WilliamNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. In re Department of Public ParksNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In re Commissioners of Central ParkNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  4. In re Main StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Application for Opening a New Highway in the Town of Whitestown, New York County Courts1898
  2. In re the Superintendent of Highways of Frankfort, New York County Courts1948
  3. City of Kingston v. TerryNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re RedmondNew York County Court, Steuben County · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API