Callipari v. 516 East 11th Street Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Motion to compel the hen or to comply with section 38 of the Lien Law. A request for a statement in writing under the statute has been demanded. The lienor has delivered such statement, which the owner claims is insufficient. The statement as delivered has been returned to the attorneys for the lienor as insufficient. A further demand in writing was made that the lienor furnish a further statement. It appears that five days have elapsed since the demand for a further statement, which demand has not been complied with. The statute requires a verified statement.
The statute provides: “ A lienor…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ambrosio v. ShickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- 819 Sixth Ave. Corp. v. T. & A. Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- In re BoryskoNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Seid v. Hanco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961