City of New York v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
The City of New York commenced this proceeding to compel the State to defend and indemnify the City pursuant to Highway Law § 349-c (8-a) in several personal injury actions commenced against the City for accidents that occurred on state arterial highways located within and maintained by the City. Supreme Court concluded that the City was covered by the statute; the Appellate Division reversed. We now affirm.
Article XII-B of the Highway Law governs state arterial highways that pass through cities…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nowlin v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York City Council v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Hedgepeth v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Albanese v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Parmerter v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2012