Legal Opinion

People v. Dillard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly advised defendant of the consequences of his plea of guilty to the reduced charge of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10), and defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty (see, People v Murray, 207 AD2d 999, 1000, lv denied 84 NY2d 1014). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw the plea. The court provided defendant a reasonable opportunity, through counsel, to advance his claims in support of the motion (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 525;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SpikesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. La VallaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. People v. McKnightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API