Legal Opinion

Burtis v. Doughty

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 15, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

This will, which has already been before me for construction, again requires judicial interpretation, on the final distribution of the estate in consequence of the decease of the testator’s widow. By one of the clauses of the will, the testator directs the sale of number fifteen James Slip, after the decease of his wife Elizabeth, and then disposes of the proceeds as follows :—“ I do give and bequeath one half of the nett proceeds of such sale to Samuel Stilwell, of Schoharie county, the son of my brother Thomas, deceased. Item, I give and bequeath to S tephen Stilwell, of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. SeamanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1877
  2. Coster v. BulterNew York Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API