Legal Opinion

Exsted v. Otto

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 21, 1939No. 31,668Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff moves this court for an order to set off the judgment for costs and disbursements entered against her herein, in the sum of $33.90, upon the judgment in her favor and against defendant, entered and docketed in the district court of McLeod county May 4, 1937, for $62.70. Defendant and his attorney herein oppose the motion upon the ground that defendant is entirely without means to compensate his attorney for his work on the appeal or for the money paid by the attorney for printing the brief.

It appears that the judgment for costs embraces the $25 statutory costs, taxable in favor of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Lundberg v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Lindholm v. Itasca Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Morton v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API