Legal Opinion

Haight v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 27, 1926No. Docket No. 6141Published

Under the Revenue Act of 1921, a wife in California was entitled to file a separate return and be taxed separately upon her separate earnings. Estate of George W. Randall,4 B.T.A. 679.

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. HAIGHT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Haight v. Commissioner

Docket No. 6141.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

4 B.T.A. 1075; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2067;

September 27, 1926, Decided

Under the Revenue Act of 1921, a wife in California was entitled to file a separate return and be taxed separately upon her separate earnings. Estate of George W. Randall,4 B.T.A. 679.

W. C. Mather, Esq., for the petitioner.

George E. Adams, Esq., for the respondent.

MORRIS

This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency of $283.74, income tax for 1922. The deficiency results…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Appeals of Estate of RandallUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  2. Haight v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API