Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gay v. Kelly

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 6, 1967No. H-439Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSack, Judge

The majority opinion reverses as to Byrd & Son Bottling Company solely upon the allegation in the complaint that the carton of six 7-Up soft drinks “had been bottled, manufactured, assembled and packaged by the defendant, Byrd & Son Bottling Company, and distributed to the defendant Kelly (the retailer) as a finished product ready for retail sale.” The majority construes this allegation as necessarily charging that Byrd & Son manufactured the carton and holds that, upon trial of the case, if the evidence discloses the carton was manufactured by some one other than Kelly, then no cause of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Hoskins v. Jackson Grain Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Prince v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Bernstein v. Lily-Tulip Cup CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Lily-Tulip Cup Corporation v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API