Cook v. Washington
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentHines, J.
After a careful consideration of the evidence in this case, I am of the opinion that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the propounders. A trial judge can only direct a verdict “Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demands a particular verdict.” Civil Code, § 5926. It is true that immaterial conflicts do riot render the -directiori of a verdict erroneous. Sanders Mfg. Co. v. Dollar Savings Bank, 110 Ga. 559 (supra); Skinner v. Braswell, 126 Ga. 761 (supra). If, however, there is any conflict in the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Coghill v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Potts v. HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- In Re Estate of NuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re Will of Amelia EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.