Legal Opinion
Silverglate v. Kirkman
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
In Canepa v. “ John Doe ” (277 N. Y. 52) an owner of a liquor store who purchased a neon sign which was hung in front of his premises brought an action against certain unions which were picketing his premises with placards bearing the legend that the sign was unfair to the defendant unions, thus creating the impression that the sign was unfair to union labor. The Court of Appeals held that (pp. 54-55) “ The complaint sufficiently alleges that the picketing by the defendants is part of a true secondary boycott and an unlawful interference with the business of the plaintiff.”
The case of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Thompson v. BoekhoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Canepa v. "John Doe"New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- American Gas Stations, Inc. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Weil & Co. v. "John Doe"New York Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Feldman v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- People ex rel. Briesblatt v. BordenNew York Supreme Court · 1940