Legal Opinion

Lukowsky v. Shalit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 1985PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*564In this action plaintiff alleges that she was fraudulently induced by defendants to enter into an agreement titled “Sublease Agreement” which, in effect, was an assignment of her rights and interests in her apartment. Special Term dismissed the complaint on the grounds that it was barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel and failed to state a cause of action against defendants. To have a complete understanding of this appeal, it is essential to discuss plaintiff’s prior actions and the factual background of this case.

On May 30, 1978, plaintiff and defendant Bruk Management Company,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Smith v. KirkpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. National Conversion Corp. v. Cedar Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Coliseum Towers Associates v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., Investment LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Republic of PalauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Stevenson Equipment, Inc. v. Chemig Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API