Legal Opinion
Linton v. Consumer Protection Division
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 3, 2020No. 33/19PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crystal Linton, et al. v. Consumer Protection Division, No. 33, September Term, 2019 (1) Individuals who had assigned structured settlement benefits filed a class action against the assignees of those benefits seeking civil damages on the ground that the assignments were the product of fraud on the part of the assignees. (Linton action). Prior to the filing of that action, the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General’s Office (CPD) had sued the assignees for violations of the Consumer Protection Act seeking civil penalties, injunctive relief, and disgorgement/restitution. The…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Mabel FLINN, Et Al., Appellants, v. FMC CORPORATION and Local 9 Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Jiffy Lube Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Assanah-Carroll v. Law Offices of MaherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Access Funding v. LintonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Access Funding v. LintonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Assanah-Carroll v. Law Offices of MaherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Access Funding, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.