Legal Opinion
W. Horace Williams Co. v. Wakulla
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided January 21, 1953No. 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, District Judge.
Libelant’s Barge No. 503 was damaged while in tow of the Tug Wakulla and libelant has brought this action against the tug and its owner. The issues of fact and law having come on to be heard on the pleadings and proofs of the parties and due deliberation having been had, the court now makes the following findings of fact and •conclusions of law.
Findings of Fact.
1. At all relevant times libelant was the owner of the barges known as 503, 403 and BSC 174. Barge 503 was employed by libelant as a pile driver ibarge. It has a model bow, a square stern and measures 129 feet in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Steamer WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- The QuickstepSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- The Clarence L. BlakesleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Stall & McDermott v. The Southern CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Otto Candies, Inc. v. Great American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Louisiana Materials Co. v. Royal PellegrinDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962