Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wold Architects and Engineers v. Strat

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2006No. Docket 126917Published

1ConcurrenceCorrigan, J.

I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the Court of Appeals determina*239tion that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition and in denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the arbitration award. A majority of this Court has decided to retain the common-law rule that arbitration agreements are unilaterally revocable at any time. Even if I were inclined to abrogate the unilateral revocation rule, a majority of this Court is not so inclined. Thus, I commend this important policy choice to our Legislature. I urge that body to examine whether it is prudent to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API