Alamo Automobile Co. v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from District Court, Bexar County; 5. G. Tayloe, Judge. Suit by Herman F. Schmidt against the Alamo ' Automobile Company. To review judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.
Defendant in error, hereinafter described as “Schmidt,” sued plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled the “company,” to recover damages for the alleged breach of a certain contract of sale of a certain “seven-passenger, 1912 Stoddard-Knight car.” The cause was tried by jury, upon a single issue, as to the value of a certain secondhand automobile described as “Stoddard car No. 9-A” delivered by Schmidt to the company, as part payment on the new car, and upon the answer judgment was rendered in favor of Schmidt for $1,200.
The contract upon which the suit was based was a letter in answer to an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- People v. CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. LufkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bob Robertson, Inc. v. Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- C. v. Hill & Co. v. FrickeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Curton v. CraddockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Paciwest, Inc. v. Warner Alan Properties, LLC, and Warner Alan/Westcliff, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Paciwest, Inc. v. Warner Alan Properties, LLC, and Warner Alan/Westcliff, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012