Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dunlap v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 8, 1991No. 1 CA-SA 91-109Published

1Concurrence

VOSS, Judge,

specially concurring.

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that we should take special action jurisdiction. However, because I disagree with the majority’s resolution of whether the superior court has jurisdiction to review the actions of a superior court judge sitting as a magistrate in the superior court, I specially concur. With all other aspects of the majority’s opinion I agree.

I disagree with the majority because both the superior court judge sitting as a magistrate and the superior court judge asked to review the magistrate’s ruling in this case, Judge Sheldon, are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Filkin v. FlessnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Price v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Green v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Price v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API