Legal Opinion

Kent v. Kaiser

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1904No. 1654Published

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Washoe County; M. A. Murphy, Judge. Action by Mary Kent against Emma Kaiser. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the statement of facts in the case of Painter v. Kaiser (page 421 of this volume), involving precisely the same issues and questions.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Washoe County; M. A. Murphy, Judge. Action by Mary Kent against Emma Kaiser. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the statement of facts in the case of Painter v. Kaiser (page 421 of this volume), involving precisely the same issues and questions. I. This action was sought to be maintained upon that certain written agreement set out in the complaint made on the 5th day of November,1901, between respondent and appellant, and which said complaint was demurred to…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Talbot, J.:

This case is similar to that of Lillie Esden v. Emma Kaiser, 27 Nev. 432, just decided by this court; and, for the reasons indicated there, the order and judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the suit are reversed, and the action is remanded to the district court, which will fix a time for the defendant to answer.

Belicnap, O. J., and Fitzgerald, J., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Esden v. KaiserNevada Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API