Legal Opinion

Strong v. City of Winter Park

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 9, 1934Published

1Per curiam

A bill of exceptions taken in an action of assumpsit -states that:

“After having heard testimony for Plaintiff counsel for Plaintiff announced ‘Rest.’ Thereupon counsel for defendant moved for a directed verdict for defendant. After argument of counsel the Court indicated he would grant the motion. Whereupon counsel for plaintiff announced that plaintiff elected to take a ‘Non-Suit,’ and asked 90 days to prepare a Bill of Exceptions, and it was so ordered by the Court.”

No judgment appears in the record, therefore the writ of error must be dismissed. Mizell Live Stock Co. v. McCaskill, 57 Fla.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mizell Live Stock Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Charlotte County v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Spiker v. HesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Downing v. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API