Welborn v. Eskey
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Red Willow county. Tried below before Cochran, J. cited: Code, Sec. 41. Estee’s Pleadings, third edition, Yol. 3, Secs. 4507-4519. cited: Fritz v. GrosnieJclaus, 20 Neb., 431.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The defendant in error brought an action of replevin against the plaintiffs in error in the county court of Red Willow county, and on the trial judgment was rendered in his favor. The case was then taken on error to the district court, where the judgment of the county court was affirmed. The record shows that the "VanNatta Lynds Drug Co. was made a defendant in the county court, but there is no evidence of service upon the company. That •company also filed a petition to intervene, the ground of intervention being stated as follows: “ That Franklin W. Eskey is in possession of said stock by…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Morgareidge v. HoweySupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Cornhusker Electric Co. v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. George T. Smith Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898