Legal Opinion
In re: Donald Gary Shannon and Mai Doan Shannon
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 22, 2016No. AZ-14-1497-JaJuKu AZ-15-1040-JaJuKuPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAIME, Bankruptcy Judge:
Creditors Andres Cardenas and Teresa Cardenas (“Cardenases”) appeal from an order denying their request for an order declaring that a debt owed by debtors Donald Gary Shannon and Mai Doan Shannon (“Shannons”) is non-dischargea-ble in the Shannons’ bankruptcy case and the judgment entered on that order discharging the debt. The bankruptcy court concluded that the Cardenases failed to prove several elements of their non-dis-chargeability claim under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), 2 which excepts from discharge debts for, among other things, money and property to the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Golden Gate Community HealthUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Aluisi v. JorgensenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2019
- In re: Rita Ramos CurielUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2023