Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Knudsen

District Court, D. Montana

Decided January 14, 2022No. 9:21-cv-00146Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION KIP HARTMAN, Cause No. CV 21-146-M-DWM Petitioner, vs. ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF AUSTIN KNUDSEN, et al., APPEALABILITY Respondents. This case comes before the Court on Petitioner Hartman’s application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Hartman faces a second trial in Montana’s Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, and asserts it is precluded by the Double Jeopardy Clause. Respondents (“the State”) filed an answer on December 21, 2021. Hartman replied on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API