Wrenn v. State

QUINCE, Judge.

David Wrenn appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction for felony criminal mischief. He argues the trial court erred in failing to find a discovery violation and in assessing various costs items. Because we find no violation of Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971), we affirm the conviction, but strike the imposition of $103.00 for the court improvement fund, and remand to the trial court for a hearing on the costs of prosecution and restitution.

In Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), this court held there is no legal authority for…