Legal Opinion

Barker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 24, 2019No. 16-1554Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS (Filed: August 27, 2019) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LISA BARKER, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 16-1554V * v. * Chief Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Reasonable AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Basis; Percentage Reduction in Fees; * Expert Costs. Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Renee J. Gentry, Vaccine Injury Clinic, George Washington University Law School, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Althea W. Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API