Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Eyman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 22, 1966No. 2 CA-HC 38PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Chief Judge.
John O. Johnson, in propria persona,, has filed in this Court an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The tenor of his application is that he was not represented by counsel on January 27, 1961, the date set for his sentencing after his plea of' guilty to a felony charge, issuing a check on insufficient funds.
Briefly, the following■ sequence of events, is disclosed by the record. On January 24, 1961, petitioner entered his plea of guilty-after stating that he neither was represented. by counsel nor desired counsel. On January 27, 1961, he was adjudged guilty, and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Volney Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Shetsky v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Ex Parte LydeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. PyeattCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Johnson v. State Ex Rel. EymanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- State v. ArceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.