Shaw v. Schietinger
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari. This writ brings up a judgment of the District Court of the city of Camden, dispossessing the prosecutor from rented premises.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reed, J.
The affidavits upon which the summons in the cause were issued showed that Frank Shaw entered into possession of the premises in question (which were then the property of one Spuhler) on the 16th of January, 1888.
The premises were rented at the monthly rent of $15. There was no express agreement in regard to the terms of holding. This arrangement made the tenure a monthly tenancy. Steffens v. Earl, 11 Vroom 128.
Afterwards, on April 1st, 1888, the reversion in the property was sold by Spuhler to Schietinger, to the agent of whom Shaw afterwards…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Austin v. . AhearneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
3Cited by2 opinions
- Finkelstein v. HersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- State ex rel. Follet v. RightorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880