Legal Opinion

Ben Snyder, Inc. v. Phoenix Amusement Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 25, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Latimer

Affirming-

Appellant, Ben Snyder, Incorporated, instituted, this action under the provisions of the Declaratory Judgment Act alleging that it owns and has the exclusive-right to the use of a vacant, unimproved strip of land about 5 feet wide and 52 feet long adjoining the property owned by appellee, Phoenix Amusement Company.

Appellee, by answer, denied that appellant had any right to prohibit the use of the strip for the purpose-of ingress and egress to and from its building adjoining-the strip of land, and pleaded affirmatively that it had “openly,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Godman v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Stephens v. HamblinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Marrs v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Flener v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Lyle v. HolmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  3. William David Ellington v. Harlan Randall BecraftKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Baker v. MaggardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  5. Williams v. SlateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API