Legal Opinion

Boitnott v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 8, 1999No. 18, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The issue presented for the Court’s consideration is the validity of Baltimore City Ordinance 97-231, amending Inner Harbor East’s urban renewal plan. We shall hold that the ordinance is valid.

I

On November 19, 1971, by Ordinance 71-1188, the City of Baltimore (“City”), through the Mayor and City Council, designated Inner Harbor East, a 20 acre tract south of Little Italy and lying between Fells Point and the Inner Harbor, as an urban renewal area, for which it approved an urban renewal plan. 1

Among the objectives of the plan were the elimination of unhealthy conditions and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Pitsenberger v. PitsenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Inlet Associates v. Assateague House Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. BiermannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Harford County v. Saks Fifth Avenue Distribution Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Maryland Overpak Corporation v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Montrose Christian School Corp. v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. City of Frederick v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API